Mar 7, 2012

Jaipur Chronicles: The Disappointment of Obama

David Remnick in discussion with Samanth Subramanian

The first lecture that I attended at the Jaipur Literature Fest was a discussion with David Remnick on Barack Obama’s Presidency. What interested me about this topic when I spotted it on the schedule of the JLF was that it was something that I had been hearing about for a while. It seemed that every week, whenever I did watch the news, there was someone on TV talking about how Obama was not doing what he was expected and what he should have done.

Personally, I felt similar, the enthusiasm that Obama had in his election was shared by people across the world. Now, it could have been because of the fact that George Bush was finally going out of the White House but I like to believe that “Yes We Can’ really made the world have a bit of a moral boost. In discussions that I overheard at home, between my relatives, people would mention how he promised to close Guantanamo Bay, how he promised to end the war in Iraq among other things. He got everyone up and enthusiastic looking forward to a complete u-turn.

This is when one starts looking at the other side of things, Obama did end the war in Iraq, but redeployed troops in Afghanistan, approved of a surgical strike to kill Osama in another nation without permission, and then there is the financial bailout.

This is where I become more accepting of the theory that Obama simply got a really bad presidency.

David Remnick is the editor of The New Yorker, an American culture magazine, and the author of several historical books most notably, ‘Lenin’s Tomb’ and ‘The Bridge’. David Remnick had a deep insight into the Obama campaign as he interview members that work very closely with the now President of the United States.

Remnick had a natural flair and charisma to him which instantly allowed every member of the audience to connect to him and every word that he uttered. Remnick was guided by Samanth Subramanian who in actuality, remained pretty quiet for most of the session as Remnick just rolled with the topics at hand.


As the talk began, Remnick was asked about how he came to know about Barack who, as a presidential candidate came out of the perceivable nowhere. Remnick discussed how the first time he’d heard of Barack Obama was in 2004 during a Democratic Party Convention in Boston. He recalled how the crowd was actually enthusiastic during the speech and were engrossed with the words that Obama spoke. As Remnick said, “He knows how to give a speech”.

It was after this that the value of Remnick’s research and insight as a journalist came out as the topic of discussion dove into why it was a black candidate that won the elections, not a woman. As Remnick points out, it was as a result of the ‘Racial Struggle’, and how the idea of a Black president was introduced with Jesse James who actually managed to win in the state of Alabama, a ‘white dominated’ state.


Remnick compared the two Democratic Candidates as having very similar policies and near identical stances on certain issues which meant that the discriminatory factors had to be included in the decision. America had to decide whether it wanted a Black President or a Female President.

As the conversation between the two-man panel ended, Samanth asked David Remnick about his opinion on the disappointment of Obama. Remnick hesitated, and clarified, that as a journalist, his job was to criticise and in that respect, Obama hadn’t done even a quarter of the things he had promised. However, on the other hand, compared to other presidents, Obama stood in a much better standing. Remnick reasoned this as the result of the time that Obama was included into office: “I can’t even count the number of crisis’s”


I can’t say I disagree with Remnick, Obama was given such high expectations during an abysmal period that it’s hard to not feel disappointed with him, but on the flipside, when you see the problems that he’s had to deal with in 4 years, he hasn’t done that bad a job.

David Remnick provided one of the most interesting insights into the current US Presidents Campaign and political mindset. From looking at his influences, his aspirations and how the man went against the odds I have to admit that this was one of my favourite sessions at the Jaipur Literary Festival.

Mar 6, 2012

The Geek Log: Entry 1


I don't care if you think I’m a nerd, a Geek or anything of the sort! This game has been in my life longer than most of my friends! (Actually...I think I made one of my best friends playing this game...)

It seems like yesterday that the original game developers Bungie said goodbye and stepped into the great beyond of New IP in 2010. However, we've all seen that with a great idea, corporate can't stop until they've flogged a franchise into a crap product.

Enter Halo 4

Yeah, it's not going to be as good. Just looking at this image I can tell you that the developers have started looking at the looks of other games, mainly Call of Duty.

If you look at the rifle, it's become blockier, more of a manufactured product than the sleek futuristic design that fans had seen over the series. Then you see the optical sights and any gamer would tell you, they've been playing CoD or some other mainstream shooter.

Don't get me wrong, Halo could learn a lot from CoD, but not this. Halo's look is what made it unique.

Then the main subject of the photo, the Master Chief. What have they done to you Chief? They’ve taken your iconic helmet and visor and turned you into what some shitty second rate developer would make... oh wait. 343 industries is making this...

So it is a second rate developer...

According to a recent article, the Creative director quit (sounds like a great game no?) and then there’s another one that says that the game will look to elaborate on the MC's humanity.

Humanity? Are you kidding me? This is a character who has been trained to be a soldier from the age of 6. According to the novels he killed his first human at the age of 14. And you want to elaborate on his 'Humanity'?

The MC was a character who was designed to have a relatively blank slate so that gamers could superimpose themselves on the character to connect better with the game. Expanding the MC's humanity would mean that you can't accidentally kill your allies! Nor would you be able to beat them just like that!

If the MC becomes a humanitarian, then I don't see why he'll stay a soldier, maybe he should start being a diplomat or better yet, a teacher...